Reframe #49: Trying again isn’t the same as failing again


Every edition of Reframe helps you shift how you think, show up and get ahead without selling out or burning out. One idea, one insight, one step at a time.

Learning and iterating can change the outcome.

Have you ever avoided trying something again because the first attempt went badly?

It could’ve been a difficult conversation, public speaking, delegating, applying for a stretch role, or even using AI for work but finding it increased your workload.

Your brain loves efficiency, so it files the experience away under: “Nope. Didn’t go well. Let’s never do that again.”

Understandable, but also… not always accurate.

Trying again with more context, better tools, and sharper judgment is not the same experiment as the first time. In fact, let’s call it Future-You Version 2.0.

So, why does this happen? Somewhere along the way, many of us started treating repeat attempts like evidence of failure.

  • “I already tried networking once, but…”
  • “I tried being more visible at that one event, but…”
  • “I tried speaking up in meetings once and it was awkward. Never again.”

Notice what’s common among these examples? One imperfect attempt being made to carry the final vote. That’s like using dial-up internet in late 90s, having a terrible experience, and deciding the internet probably wasn’t for you.

The truth is, capability often looks messy before it looks natural. And the first attempt usually teaches you what the real problem is.

Maybe you didn’t fail at networking; you just approached it transactionally.

Maybe you didn’t fail at delegating or using AI. Your instructions, just like your prompts, were unclear, unspecific, and (respectfully) terrible.

The distinction matters because if you label every imperfect first draft as failure, you stop iterating right before progress gets interesting.

So, what would trying this again look like with better inputs? It could be:

  • Asking for feedback before your next attempt
  • Changing your approach, not just repeating it
  • Using tools that actually support the outcome
  • Practicing in lower-stakes environments first
  • Letting “not good yet” be different from “not for me”

Growth tends to reward people who adjust intelligently based on signals and feedback received.

So if there’s something you’ve written off because version one didn’t go to plan, maybe this is your cue to run a better experiment.

Just a reminder that Reframe is moving to Substack, starting next week. You’ll still receive the full newsletter in your inbox every Thursday, exactly as you do now. Your subscription carries over automatically.

Make sure you add reframenewsletter@substack.com to your trusted senders list so you don’t miss an issue.

Until next time…

Mal
Founder, The Ideas Accelerator
Helping you grow your career with strategic insight and smarter tools.

Keep Your Momentum Going.

Strategic Advisor Blueprint
Turn your expertise into influence.

Strategic Advisor Blueprint is a self-paced course designed to help you communicate like a trusted advisor, shape executive conversations, and position yourself as an indispensable partner in any room.
👉 Explore the Blueprint

The Career Visibility Diagnostic
Be seen for the impact you make.

The Career Visibility Diagnostic is a guided self-assessment that uncovers the hidden career visibility pattern keeping your work overlooked—so you can stop second-guessing and start being seen, remembered, and trusted.
👉 Take the Diagnostic

Free Career Resources
Advice to transform your career.

Looking for practical, high-impact career resources to help you grow? Explore our library of free guides, templates, and tools designed to help you take action with clarity and confidence.
👉 Access Library

This newsletter is intended for subscribers and community members of The Ideas Accelerator. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here.

No longer interested? Unsubscribe

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246